Liberty or Sustainable Development?
Chapter
11: Reinvention of Government - Part 2
Saturday, November 1, 2008
By Michael Shaw
Freedom Advocates
This chart shows the Sustainable Development organizational framework in
Southern California.
San Fernando Valley has a population of about two million people; much of
it is part of the City of Los Angeles. Vision 20-20: San Fernando is
one of the 12 Southern California midlevel regional soviets.
This ‘visioning plan’ calls for:
• “Economic Development and Business Assistance.” Why is this dubiously financed council giving economic development and business
assistance to businesses? Part of the reason is to find the compliant
“partners’ for a new economic order.
• “Workforce and Education Investment.”
Workforce and Education! What do they plan
to do with children?
• Vision 20-20 calls for “livable and sustainable
communities.” That ultimately means “official” use
only of cars; bicycle and rail for most, government child care and assigned
jobs for ordinary people – the worker bees and the bee keepers.
Vladimir Lenin said, “Few bureaucrats (or change agents) need to understand
our goals and our philosophy. Most are simply useful idiots.”
Have you, or someone you know, been fooled?
Here is a regionalized California.
Governor Schwarzenegger has replaced the California Wildlands Project chief,
Mary Nichols, a disciple of Clinton’s EPA chief Carol Browner.
Ms. Nichols had successfully implemented a vast array of draconian policies
on rural California land owners and land managers. Nichols was so successful
that the Sustainable Development globalist political machine could pretend
to lessen the acceleration of heat on rural land owners. In reality,
the change of governor merely changed the focus of Sustainable Development
from the Wildlands project to the urban element of Sustainable Development
– Smart Growth. Sunne Wright-McPeak formerly headed a California
Regional Leadership Council, The Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development.
She now heads up a new state Housing, Transportation and Jobs agency.
State centralization of local land use has been slipped in without public
awareness. This agency immediately began the rapid acceleration of state
Smart Growth mandates, bribes and extortions of local communities.
In Santa Cruz, local Sustainable Developers are coordinated with the new
state policy. So much so that the county now plans 10,000, government
controlled, housing ‘units’. The tenants will be chosen
by the “Housing Authority”. Rents are not to exceed 30%
of income. I contend that a class of government dependents and political
machine operatives will be created so to drive an unrestrained democracy
to impose further controls on currently unsuspecting citizens. The Santa
Cruz plans reflect cookie cutter Smart Growth proposals; business at
street level – stacks of small living quarters built on top. The
mass and sudden densification will be built within walking distance
to mass transit. The infrastructure is intended to be unfriendly for
car use. There are back room discussions about government child care
on every block, water and energy masters and workforce directives.
The new Santa Cruz Planning Director has been given czar-like rezoning powers.
For the prior 15 years this man has been in a back room with a large
staff doing “advanced planning”. Today a number of “non
profits” and other compliant developers own many key parcels.
Often these parcels had owners whose reasonable goals were frustrated
by the same Planning Department for decades.
The local paper reports $295 million of state and federal tax grants to
subsidize the first 3700 small sustainable dwellings! Smart Growth means
guaranteed profits for insiders, a life of dependency for some residents
and an activist pad for others. All arranged to subvert the premise
of the American Republic.
Smart Growth’s goal is to centralize control over urban life. Federal,
state and local “partnerships” and MOU’s (Memorandums
of Understanding) implement the creation of an infrastructure for a
post private property era. The Sustainable Developer goal is to destroy
the federalist system of government, representative democracy and the
liberty that the American system of government was designed to protect.
Santa Cruz globalists are being rewarded for leading the pack. The Santa Cruz
political machinery’s huge reward is paid with your tax dollars.
Liberty! or Sustainable Development is a 13 Chapter serial adaptation of the
transcript of Michael Shaw’s opening speech from the video: Liberty
or Sustainable Development. Michael Shaw is President
of Freedom Advocates.org. He can be reached at Shaw@FreedomAdvocates.org.
Chapter 1: Understanding Liberty ----
Chapter 2: The Decay of Liberty – An Illustration ----
Chapter 3: Defining Sustainable Development ----
Chapter 4: Liberty or Sustainable Development? ----
Chapter 5: A Closer Look at Sustainable Development Part A----
Chapter 6: A Closer Look at Sustainable Development Part B----
Chapter 7: Sustainable Development’s
Land Use Element ----
Chapter 8: Rooting
Sustainable Development in the USA----
Chapter 9: A Healthy Planet and
Individual Liberty are Inseparable----
Chapter 10: Reinvention
of Government - Part 1----
Chapter 11: Reinvention
of Government - Part 2----
Chapter 12: Directing Local Action - Globalist Organizations----
Chapter 13: The issue is Liberty----
Michael Shaw is
a licensed attorney, and Certified Public Accountant. He has made a career
in real estate having developed a multi state chain of self storage projects.
He is President of Freedom
Advocates.org and speaks on how Sustainable Development is designed
to transform America. He is also proprietor of Liberty
Garden, a native plant oasis located on the central coast of California.
He is a litigant in cases against Santa Cruz and Alameda Counties in connection
with the application of Sustainable policy.
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further information please refer to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|
