April 10,
2008
Honorable Secretary of
State Ben Ysursa and Honorable Idaho legislators,
It was interesting when I
stopped by the Capitol Annex on Tuesday March 25, 2008. I was going to ask a
few questions of a representative, but was stopped by an officer. This
representative had already agreed to ask a few questions that would be
directed to the Attorney General's Office. This officer said my presence made
a few of the legislators nervous. He also said I was not welcome at the
Capitol Annex. This officer was just transferred to this Capitol Annex
security duty just two days prior to this incident. Then Officer Pattis
(serial number 3359) joined him and said the same thing and added more.
Officer Pattis, an Idaho State Trooper, said I was not welcome at the State
Board of Education's offices. This is interesting; I have not been there in
years (literally). Furthermore, I have not attended a State Board of Education
meeting for quite some time as well. Then he added "I was not welcome on the
third and fourth floors of the Borah building; this is where the Governor's
offices are located." Officer Pattis also made the comment if I "had to
use the post office in the Borah Building, to get in and get out." He also
added "Do not contact legislators" and "Do not e-mail them." He also gave me
the implication problems would occur for me if I did. There is no written
notification or anything of that nature. I have not threatened anyone either.
I believe there has been a pretty clear breach of law here. I am also under
the impression that Officer Pattis willfully carried out an unlawful order. I
want to know the authorization and jurisdiction for these orders. I also
consider it inexcusable to use law enforcement to intimidate law-abiding
citizens to not contact with their elected officials.
I checked with
Representative Pete Nielsen on Thursday night, March 27, 2008 at my Elmore
County Republican Central Committee meeting. Pete said he would make a copy of
what I wrote and take it to Representative Rich Wills. The orders would
have to come from the executive side of state government according to Pete.
This concerns me a lot and makes me very nervous. I did have some
discussions with people on the Senate Education committee. A few of the
issues would put the Attorney General's Office in an embarrassing position. I
have no qualms discussing these matters in public, if official avenues of
redress, investigation, and discussion (confidential or otherwise) are being
denied. I did not tell very many people this particular detail of
importance: on January 12, 2008, I had a private discussion with Attorney
General Wasden at the Republican Central Committee Meeting. It was Attorney
General Wasden that asked me to go through legislators with questions. This is
one of reasons that I do not believe it is Lawrence at all, but I can be
wrong.
One of the embarrassing
examples discussed is Attorney General Wasden does believe it is appropriate
to have a Deputy Attorney General for the State Board of Education (Jeff
Schrader) that is married to a Boise State University Dean (Dr. Cheryl B.
Schrader) and Attorney General Wasden claims this does not constitute a
"conflict of interest." In my personal meeting with Luci Willitts and Mr. Jeff
Schrader via Laird Stone a few years ago, Mr. Schrader claimed "conflict of
interest" because of that relationship. This was in the context of official
business. Attorney General Wasden claims an investigation occurs. I claim an
investigation was halted. Furthermore, when the State Board of Education was
asked in an open forum to recuse their lawyer or seek third party arbitration,
they ignored this action. Requests for executive session testimony was also
ignored. These actions could have been used against State Board of Education
members with respect to their competency and integrity in a manner that could
challenge their fitness to sit on that Board. Furthermore, three of the
current members and one of the former members who desires a reappointment are
lawyers. This is not the only issue that I discussed.
I would be willing to
provide more details upon request. You have my permission to share this e-mail
with other legislators, the press, and the Governor himself. I do believe
Clete Edmunson (Governor Otter's Educational Advisor) has taken part in this
matter for other reasons. The information I presented in December at Glenns
Ferry's Capitol for a Day never received a response. Clete gave me "the
legislature is in session and I am too busy to respond to you" act on January
31, 2008 when I ran into him at the Capitol Annex. I have a request for a
meeting with the Governor where I stated I was not happy with his behavior;
this request has gone unanswered. It was Governor Otter at the Young
Republican's luncheon that personally gave me every indication that a meeting
after the session was doable. In my request, I also wanted to discus the State
Board of Education and its behavior too. I find it very disturbing to tell a
person you do not have access to public property or to your public elected
representation without proper procedures and due process. I am going to ask
you who gave that order and if an investigation is needed?
After consulting with many
people, I was told what Officer Pattis had done was inappropriate, shocking,
illegal, and what most people considered extremely suspicious. It is my
understanding, that a law enforcement officer can detain someone for an
immediate danger, but a future banning a person from public property
without a restraining order, summons, or a court order is
illegal. "Due process" is needed in such matters. On April 2,
2008 I went to see one of my representatives at the Capitol Annex to find out
what was happening on this matter and to give him a copy of the complaint I
was turning into the Attorney General's Office, the Governor's Office, and the
Secretary of State. The complaint contains the earlier parts of this e-mail
with Officer Pattis' name misspelled (as Pettis) and one grammar mistake which
is corrected in this e-mail. I then went to the Borah Building. I first went
to the Secretary of State's office. While I was at the Governor's Office, I
asked for my complaint to go to Bob Wells. I believe he is in charge of the
Idaho State Police for the Governor. Upon leaving the Borah Building and
turning in complaints, Officer Pattis stopped me at the corner of 8th and
State Street. Officer Pattis was in a patrol car. I was on foot.
He decided to put me in handcuffs and cited me for trespass (18-7011). This
was less than 5 minutes after I left the Borah Building. On the
citation, it says 8th and State Street. This is a public
intersection. "How can I be trespassing at a public
intersection?" If Officer Pattis had intended or forgot some other
location for the trespass, I consider it a major oversight to neglect
including it on the citation.
During the time I was
handcuffed, a second officer pulled Officer Pattis aside and had a private
talk with him in the back of his patrol car; I found this very unusual as
well. Even though Officer Pattis said he would give me his business card with
the citation, he did not. He also claims everything was being recorded.
Officer Pattis uncuffed me at this point in time. In fact, Officer Pattis had
problems taking off the handcuffs and had to borrow another officer's key to
do so. I was accompanied by a security guard to the Attorney General's Office
where I turned in the aforementioned complaint that included Officer Pattis in
it. I was also escorted by two security guards almost all the way to my
car by the Capitol Annex.
Officer Pattis would not
release who gave that order to detain me. I find this extremely
disturbing. I have a right to face my accuser; I have a right to face who gave
those orders. I would also like to know if a picture of me sits in the visors
of a number of patrol cars around the Capitol as well. Law enforcement does
not act like this by random. To this date, my representatives (Pete Nielsen
and Rich Wills) have not been able to get "who gave that order" from the
executive branch.
The timing and nature of
these actions were also a concern to me. The actions from Officer Pattis
occurred after the Milford Terrell re-appointment confirmation in the Senate.
The Senate Education committee knew I was opposed to Milford's nomination
because of the actions of the entire State Board of Education. The comment
from Officer Pattis involving the State Board of Education's offices is very
suspicious. Officer Pattis' comment to not contact legislators also looks
strange and would not allow for oversight by legislators; this erodes the
bonds of trust of our elected officials between the public as well. This
is the major reason I do not believe legislators are involved in these strange
actions, except possibly after the fact. Pressure from the State Board
of Education and the Governor's Office cannot be discounted.
To me, there is a more
important issue. I was sharing confidential information with
legislators. At no time should members of the public be intimidated to
see or contact their legislators to prevent sharing of information
and concerns! This is a fundamental trust as far as I am
concerned and this goes beyond party loyalty. I know good people on both
sides of the aisle. I do not believe that legislators want to be working
in a vacuum. I also hope the public is invited to take part in
the legislators' decision making process. These past actions have called
into question if the moniker of the "Citizen's Statehouse" is still
appropriate.
Respectfully,
Christopher A. Pentico
Elmore County Republican Youth
Committeeman
120 NW Carrie Circle
Mountain Home, ID
83647
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For further information please refer to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|