Citizens for a Constitutional Republic
Firebase For Freedom ( Judicial )


THIS  PAGE
TO A FRIEND 

Judicial Links
Judicial Books
Jury Nullification
Judicial Articles
    

Judicial Quotes



 Thank You !!! Members Of The Armed Services !!! 

JUDICIAL
ACTION ALERTS ! ! ! ---Key Bills in Congress

The Judiciary

      The United States Constitution does not provide for lifetime appointment of federal judges, but only for a term of office during good behavior. We support Congressional enforcement of the Constitutional rule of good behavior and to restrain judicial activism by properly removing offending judges through the process of impeachment provided for in Article I & II and III of the Constitution. Furthermore, Congress must exert the power it possesses to prohibit all federal courts from hearing cases which Congress deems to be outside federal jurisdiction pursuant to Article III & II of the Constitution.

      We particularly support all the legislation which would remove from Federal appellate review jurisdiction matters involving acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.



Disorder in
the Court

Thursday, May 22, 2008

By Russ Diamond


Intimidation by State Trooper at (IDAHO) Capitol Annex while trying to contact legislator
Sunday, April 13, 2008

By Dwight M. Callaway


Merit Selection Rears
Its Ugly Head

Thursday, March 20, 2008

By Russ Diamond


Political rhetoric over federal judges heats up
Tuesday, March 4, 2008

By James Oliphant


Nominations staredown
in the Senate

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

By Martin Kady II and Ryan Grim


Obama's Class-War Court
Wednesday, February 27, 2008

By Terence Jeffrey


Judicial supremacists'
latest outrage

Friday February 15, 2008

By Phyllis Schlafly


McConnell: Judges slowdown
"neither fair nor acceptable"

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

By Curt Levey


Judges Issue in Michigan Primary
Thursday, January 10, 2008

By Curt Levey


Tyranny of the
American Bar Association

Saturday, January 12, 2008

By Ellis Washington


Common law vs.
continental law:
Rules vs. truth

Saturday, December 29, 2007

By Ellis Washington

ACTION ALERT
American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007 (H.R. 3835)
Friday, October 19, 2007

By John Birch Society

High Court Case Pits Texas Against Bush and International Court of Justice
Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Randy Hall

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT…

This afternoon, the President nominated two outstanding attorneys to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit: Duncan Getchell of Virginia and Steve Matthews of South Carolina. They join Robert Conrad of North Carolina, who was nominated to the 4th Circuit in July. We urge Senators of both parties to move quickly to confirm these three nominees, because the 33% vacancy rate on the Fourth Circuit endangers justice not only for the people who live in the Circuit, but for the entire nation. After all, many of the nation’s most important War on Terror cases are decided in the 4th Circuit.

Biographies of the new nominees:

Getchell:

Matthews:

Curt Levey
Executive Director
The Committee for Justice
1920 L Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 270-7748


Mukasey Nomination Should
Speed Confirmation of Judges

Tuesday, September 18, 2007


Southwick Win is Huge Setback for Dems, But Fight is Not Over
Friday, August 3, 2007


Southwick Resolution is Test for Red State Democrats One Way or Another, We ll Know Where Every Senator Stands
Thursday, August 2, 2007


60 Groups Demand Judiciary Cmte
Do Its Job on Judges

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

By Curt Levey


Bush stirs sparks on judges
Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Carrie Budoff Brown


Sen. Orrin G. Hatch Floor Speech:
Regarding Judge Mukasey and Other Nominations

Friday, September 21, 2007

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch


Jewish Extremist Nominated
U.S. Attorney General

Thursday, September 20, 2007

By David Duke


 Judicial Tyranny 
November 9, 2007


 Betrayed By The Bench 
January 2, 2006

By Larry Pratt


GOP slowdown in Senate Judiciary Committee?
Tuesday, July 31, 2007

By Carrie Budoff



 “The Law”  
Monday, June 04, 2007

By Cecilia “Ciel” Poole


 Mafia, or the Courts:
Which is Worse?
 
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 

By Ron Branson


 Cheers For An
Independent Judge
 
Wednesday, January 10, 2007 

By Phyllis Schlafly

 Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales Announces Creation Of Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit within the Civil Rights Division  
Wednesday, January 31, 2007

 Political donations often pave way to seat on the bench  
Sunday, April 22, 2007

Kibret Markos

 Attorney General Has Dangerous Attitudes About the Constitution 
Tuesday, January 23, 2007

John F. McManus

 Jury Nullification and the Rule of Law
1997 

By Kelley L. Ross, Ph.D

 Jury Nullification 

Doug Linder

 The Jury Revolution 

Dwight M. Callaway



Jury Nullification (and Revolution)
at the NATIONAL PRESS CLUB,  Washington,  D.C.

Acquitted Defendant Whitey Harold and one of his jurors tells the NATIONAL PRESS CLUB in Wash. DC how a jury nullified the IRS. This juror will move you as she explains what happened.

This is not a "pure nullification" in that the jury did not precisely "nullify a bad law". What this jury did (precisely) was to find the defendant NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS, and thereby NULLIFY THE IRS, because there is no law, requiring Americans to pay the income tax. Which, if you think about it, is even better.

I am sitting on a T1 line, yet this video downloads slowly for some reason. You can save time by clicking on the link, then pausing and doing something else while the video file fully loads. Then you may watch it without any halts, pauses or wasted time.
This is the JURY REVOLUTION in action and this video clip needs to be viewed by millions of people. It will bring gladness to the hearts of all true Americans and especially all of us who love and honor trial by jury.

Below are some very relevant excerpts from my essay on the JURY REVOLUTION. You may read the entire essay
here:
"Imagine a jury nullification verdict happening somewhere in America.  After the jurors are dismissed by the judge, they immediately walk outside of the courthouse (with the former defendant if they choose) and walk straight up to the TV cameras and newspaper reporters and explain why they nullified the law and why they had the right and power to do so.  And they explain exactly how the judge unsuccessfully tried to trick them, bluff them, intimidate them and tamper with them.  They go on to publicly demand that the local Grand Jury indict this judge immediately for attempted jury tampering and indict all the local or state judges for conspiracy to commit jury tampering, among other indictments.  This scenario can happen and it will happen.  This is a Jury Revolution and it can spread to all states relatively easily, cheaply and quickly -- once it happens in one state. ----------
The judge places himself in such a high and mighty position with his words, tone, posture, facial expressions, etc. that when the jury knocks him down, he has much further to fall.  We have heard reports of judges flying into insane rages in their chambers after a jury veto.  When a particular judge gets nullified all the other judges know about it and do not like it.  They might view the nullified judge as weak - a screw up who “failed to control the jury”.  Most other judges are also going to rightfully fear the same humiliation will soon happen to them.  The people are blowing down their house of cards.------------"


Dwight Callaway
Boise, Idaho USA


Corporate Foundations Bankroll Anti-Alito Coalition

By Timothy P. Carney

The New Clergy

By David Sturgell

Defending American Values from Activist Judges

By Sensenbrenner spokesman Raj Bharwani

Once Symbolic, Flag Amendment Close to Passage

By Janet Hook, Times Staff Writer

Judge Boyle deserves a vote

From U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C.

President celebrates swearing-in for White House aide turned federal judge

By Deb Riechmann

The Keystones
How Pennsylvania's very different senators teamed up to make Judge Roberts's confirmation possible.

By Manuel Miranda
Friday, September 9, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters



Are you concerned that the United Nations... ...would deny your right to a trial by jury?


Mark R. Levin Archive

 A Constitution of Convenience 
3-12-06
 How the Government Breaks the Law 
5-7-06

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

 Virginia C. Armstrong, Ph.D. Articles 

 The war on Christmas 
December 13, 2005
 Forging a Healthy BOND 
November 22, 2005
 Our great charter of liberty 
November 15, 2005
 The lessons of school choice 
February 21, 2006

By Rebecca Hagelin

The ACLU's shocking legacy
August 25, 2005
ACLU's war on American sovereignty
October 20, 2005

By Alan Sears

 George Detweiler Articles 

HMOs/Lawyers vs. Doctor/Hospital/Patients How U.S. Supreme Court is Destroying America If You Sue and Lose, You Pay the Bill ACLU Must Lose its Tax-Exempt Status  Gordon Bishop Articles 

By Gordon Bishop

 Phyllis Schlafly Articles 

 Devvy Kidd Articles 

 Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. Articles 

Interpret, Don't Invent

By Ed Feulner

Supreme Court Upholds Parental Notification Law

By Susan Jones


 KENNEDY OFFENDS THE CONSTITUTION  
FROM CAMELOT TO STUMBLE & BUMBLE ALOT


THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANIFESTO


Senator Specter's Statatement On The Senate Judiciary Committee


The Alien and Sedition
Acts of 1798

Under the threat of war with France, Congress in 1798 passed four laws in an effort to strengthen the Federal government. Known collectively as the Alien and Sedition Acts, the legislation sponsored by the Federalists was also intended to quell any political opposition from the Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson.

The first of the laws was the Naturalization Act, passed by Congress on June 18. This act required that aliens be residents for 14 years instead of 5 years before they became eligible for U.S. citizenship.

Congress then passed the Alien Act on June 25, authorizing the President to deport aliens "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States" during peacetime.

The third law, the Alien Enemies Act, was enacted by Congress on July 6. This act allowed the wartime arrest, imprisonment and deportation of any alien subject to an enemy power.

The last of the laws, the Sedition Act, passed on July 14 declared that any treasonable activity, including the publication of "any false, scandalous and malicious writing," was a high misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. By virtue of this legislation twenty-five men, most of them editors of Republican newspapers, were arrested and their newspapers forced to shut down.

One of the men arrested was Benjamin Franklin's grandson, Benjamin Franklin Bache, editor of the Philadelphia Democrat-Republican Aurora. Charged with libeling President Adams, Bache's arrest erupted in a public outcry against all of the Alien and Sedition Acts.

Many Americans questioned the constitutionality of these laws. Indeed, public opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts was so great that they were in part responsible for the election of Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, to the presidency in 1800. Once in office, Jefferson pardoned all those convicted under the Sedition Act, while Congress restored all fines paid with interest.

The Alien Enemies Act

The Sedition Act



Back to Top